To what extent thought about that, if lost here with Federer, he was a little like crossing the house entrance to him?
It did not think about that. If Roger had won to me, she would have been on way to conquer the Grand Slam, and that sample the great thing that is like player. To lose with him a end of Roland Garros, is something that had entered within the logic.

Important tactics, moments…
First I must say that I feel much by Roger. I am in favor sad of him, because he is a good companion, that always he is amiable, and this one is the victory that him lack for the Grand Slam. He played to make history. Tactical, I have tried to load on its misfortune, later to open to the right, but Federer was taken off, it was covering his misfortune, and the space was more and more reduced there. Basically, everything has been to believe in me. All the party fighting there. I only began to see it clear when I put myself in the last with 40-0 game. Finally this year has been better than the previous one. It can be my better Roland Garros. Yes, I believe that it is it.

Have been key the 10 break points that Federer has not turned the first Seth?
Those balls that I saved in the first Seth were very important, but it was in a moment so that nothing was decided. It was more important when I could do break to him at the beginning of the third Seth, when he had gained the second, and I escaped 3-0 in that third Seth. Perhaps it was the key of everything there. But I want to insist on the greatness of Federer: Pete Sampras, in his better days, never surpassed 5,500 points ATP, and Roger, regularly, is in more than 8.000…